TL;DR: This best MCP servers list ranks 163 Model Context Protocol servers from the official MCP Registry on real adoption data. Top of the list on our composite quality score is Codebase Memory at 96/100; the most-downloaded is Chrome DevTools MCP at 1,563,379 weekly package downloads. 92 of 163 (56%) are first-party servers built by the vendor whose product they connect to, and every one carries copy-paste install snippets for 4 AI clients.
Last updated: 7 August 2026. Data pulled: 7 August 2026, from the official MCP Registry plus the GitHub API, npm, PyPI and the GitHub Advisory Database. Servers ranked: 163. Combined weekly package downloads: 2,256,524.
Data note. GitHub enrichment covers 161 of the 163 servers in this build, so star counts, licences and release history are reported directly from the GitHub API.
An MCP server is a program that exposes tools, data and prompts to AI applications through the Model Context Protocol, the open standard Anthropic released in November 2024. It is the adapter that lets Claude, Cursor, VS Code or ChatGPT read from and act on an external system without bespoke integration code.
Most MCP lists are a copy of somebody’s GitHub “awesome” file. This one is built from the official registry and enriched with adoption, maintenance and security data, so you can compare servers rather than just discover them.
The Numbers Worth Quoting
- 163 MCP servers ranked as of 7 August 2026 across 11 categories. 44 of them (27%) ship an MCP-specific npm or PyPI package, together drawing 2,256,524 downloads a week.
- Chrome DevTools MCP is the most downloaded MCP server at 1,563,379 a week, 69.3% of attributable download volume. The top three take 92.5% and the top ten 97.8%.
- 26 servers are excluded from those download totals because their package is a wider library rather than the MCP server, setting aside 13,655,940 weekly downloads (86% of the raw sum). Most MCP rankings sum these in.
- 92 of 163 (56%) are first-party, published under a registry-verified namespace the vendor owns. They account for 98.9% of download volume.
- Developer Tools is the biggest category at 54 servers (33%), followed by Other at 26.
- 116 of 163 run over stdio as a local process. Only 62 (38%) offer Streamable HTTP, and just 60 publish a hosted remote endpoint.
- All 163 servers ship install snippets for Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code and Claude Code, so adding any of them is a copy-paste.
- 78 publish to npm and 34 to PyPI, which is why Node and Python are effectively the two runtimes of the MCP ecosystem.
- 6 security advisories across the whole list, and every one of them is already patched. 108 servers (66%) have no known advisory, 5 carry a patched one, none carry an unpatched one, and 50 cannot be checked at all because they publish no queryable package.
- Maintenance is strong: median 3 days since the last update, 142 servers (87%) updated within 30 days, and none untouched for over a year.
- Nothing on this list is flagged deprecated in the registry. Deprecated servers are not hidden when they do appear, because one still turns up in search results elsewhere and you deserve to know its status.
Every figure is reproducible from the tables below. Methodology and citation line at the bottom.
What Is an MCP Server, and What Does This List Cover?
An MCP server is a small program that wraps a system, a database, a GitHub repo, a Slack workspace, a browser, and exposes it to an AI client through three primitives: tools the AI can call, resources it can read, and prompts it can reuse. The client talks to it over JSON-RPC, either locally over stdio or remotely over Streamable HTTP.
Inclusion here is automatic. A server is ranked when it appears in the official MCP Registry with a description and a working install method (an npm, PyPI, OCI or NuGet package, or a public remote URL), and clears an adoption floor. Servers marked deleted are excluded; servers marked deprecated are kept and badged, because you deserve to know a thing is deprecated rather than simply not find it.
One thing this list does that a GitHub “awesome” file cannot: it tells you whether the vendor built the server themselves. That distinction matters more than any score, and it gets its own section below.
The Most-Downloaded MCP Servers
There is no universal install counter for the Model Context Protocol, so weekly npm and PyPI download counts are the closest available proxy for a server actually being pulled into real projects. They measure installs rather than bookmarks, which is why they sit alongside stars in the adoption pillar rather than behind them.
Two caveats set the scope of this section, and the second one is the reason our numbers are lower than you will see elsewhere.
Downloads only exist for servers distributed as a package. A remote-only server behind a hosted URL, or one shipped solely as a container image, has nothing for npm or PyPI to count, so it is absent here rather than sitting at zero.
We do not count a download unless the package is the MCP server. Many registry entries point at a general-purpose library that merely also exposes an MCP server, and its download count measures the whole library. The largest single case is browser-use, whose registry entry points at `browser-use`: those 13,400,923 weekly downloads are people installing that library, the overwhelming majority of whom never touch its MCP server. Counting it would be the download equivalent of crediting a server with its parent project’s GitHub stars, which is why the engine already rejects borrowed stars and why we reject borrowed downloads on the same principle.
So 26 servers are excluded from every download total in this report, setting aside 13,655,940 weekly downloads, 86% of the raw sum. They appear in the full list with their download cell marked library-wide rather than as a number that is not comparable to the rest. What remains is 44 servers (27% of the list) whose package is the MCP server itself, drawing 2,256,524 downloads a week between them. Every download figure and percentage below is computed over that subset. If you see an MCP ranking where a single server holds the overwhelming majority of all downloads, it has almost certainly summed the libraries.
One further limit we cannot correct: a few vendors ship many servers through a single shared package, so that package’s downloads are attributed to the one server the registry attaches it to rather than split across the family.
| Rank | MCP server | Category | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chrome DevTools MCP | Developer Tools | 1,563,379 | First-party | 0d ago | 93/100 |
| 2 | Amazon ECS MCP Server | Cloud | 408,361 | First-party | 179d ago | 78/100 |
| 3 | Azure MCP Server | Cloud | 114,702 | First-party | 0d ago | 89/100 |
| 4 | ClickHouse | Databases | 47,481 | First-party | 2d ago | 88/100 |
| 5 | Windows-MCP | Developer Tools | 18,688 | First-party | 0d ago | 89/100 |
| 6 | SmartBear MCP | Other | 14,179 | First-party | 0d ago | 83/100 |
| 7 | Power BI Modeling MCP Server | Other | 14,080 | First-party | 7d ago | 88/100 |
| 8 | Deep Agentic Core MCP | Developer Tools | 9,076 | First-party | 2d ago | 79/100 |
| 9 | CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server | Developer Tools | 8,764 | First-party | 1d ago | 85/100 |
| 10 | Zotero MCP | Search & Web | 7,638 | Community | 2d ago | 84/100 |
| 11 | mcp | Databases | 7,222 | First-party | 0d ago | 81/100 |
| 12 | Codebase Memory | AI & Memory | 4,175 | Community | 0d ago | 96/100 |
| 13 | Rootly | DevOps & Monitoring | 3,503 | First-party | 1d ago | 82/100 |
| 14 | ClaudeR - RStudio MCP Server | Developer Tools | 3,275 | Community | 4d ago | 76/100 |
| 15 | OpenTakeoff | Developer Tools | 3,260 | First-party | 0d ago | 79/100 |
Read download counts for what they are even after that filtering. A server pulled into a CI pipeline or rebuilt into a container image every week racks up downloads fast, which is a genuine signal of production use but not the same as a headcount of humans. Chrome DevTools MCP at 1,563,379 a week is well clear of the rest of the field, and servers wired into automated environments get re-installed on every run.
The median packaged server gets 1,663 downloads a week. So the distance between the leader and the middle of the pack is several orders of magnitude, and most MCP servers are still early.
The Best MCP Servers by Quality Score
| Rank | MCP server | Category | Quality score | Weekly downloads | First-party | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Codebase Memory | AI & Memory | 96/100 | 4,175 | Community | No known advisory |
| 2 | Repowise | Productivity | 95/100 | library-wide | First-party | No known advisory |
| 3 | World Monitor | Other | 94/100 | not reported | First-party | Not checked |
| 4 | Chrome DevTools MCP | Developer Tools | 93/100 | 1,563,379 | First-party | Advisory, patched |
| 5 | Agent Skills Search Server | Search & Web | 93/100 | not reported | First-party | Not checked |
| 6 | Scrapling MCP Server | Cloud | 92/100 | library-wide | Community | No known advisory |
| 7 | browser-use | Search & Web | 91/100 | library-wide | First-party | Advisory, patched |
| 8 | mcp-server | Productivity | 91/100 | not reported | First-party | Not checked |
| 9 | Oh My Posh Validator | Other | 91/100 | not reported | First-party | Not checked |
| 10 | XcodeBuildMCP | Productivity | 90/100 | not reported | First-party | No known advisory |
| 11 | apify-mcp-server | Other | 90/100 | not reported | First-party | Not checked |
| 12 | Azure MCP Server | Cloud | 89/100 | 114,702 | First-party | Advisory, patched |
| 13 | Windows-MCP | Developer Tools | 89/100 | 18,688 | First-party | Advisory, patched |
| 14 | Microsoft Fabric MCP Server | Other | 89/100 | 882 | First-party | No known advisory |
| 15 | sem | AI & Memory | 89/100 | not reported | First-party | No known advisory |
This ranking weighs adoption alongside maintenance, growth, trust and security, so it surfaces servers that are well run rather than only widely installed.
Quality scores here run from 61 to 96 with a median of 77 and a mean of 78.2. That is a wider spread than the model or extension lists we publish, because MCP is young: the difference between a vendor-maintained server with a licence and a repo, and a weekend project published to the registry, is large and the score reflects it.
How Is the Quality Score Calculated?
Five weighted pillars: adoption 35%, maintenance 25%, growth 15%, trust 15%, security 10%.
- Adoption (35%) is a composite proxy, stated plainly. Adoption blends weekly package downloads with GitHub stars, both log-scaled. MCP has no universal usage metric, so this is never presented as an exact install count.
- Maintenance (25%) is how recently the server was updated, plus its release cadence.
- Growth (15%) is the 30-day trend, computed from our own stored snapshots, so it appears only once enough history exists. A server with no history shows no trend rather than a fabricated number.
- Trust (15%) is structural: a first-party namespace, an open-source licence, and a public repository.
- Security (10%) maps each server’s npm or PyPI package to the GitHub Advisory Database. A server with no queryable package, remote-only or container-only, shows “not checked” rather than a false all-clear.
No server pays to be listed or ranked, and there are no affiliate links anywhere on this page.
First-Party or Community? The Signal That Matters Most
92 of 163 servers (56%) are first-party: published under a reverse-DNS or GitHub-organisation namespace the registry verified as belonging to the vendor. The other 71 (44%) are community builds.
This is the single most decision-relevant fact in the dataset, and it is the one a star count cannot tell you.
An MCP server usually needs credentials. A database server wants a connection string, a Slack server wants a workspace token, a cloud server wants API keys with real permissions. When the server is first-party, you are trusting the same company you already trusted with the underlying product. When it is community, you are extending that trust to a third party, which may be entirely fine and may be better maintained, but it is a separate decision you should make knowingly.
First-party servers take 98.9% of all download volume, so the ecosystem is consolidating around vendor-built bridges faster than the raw server counts suggest.
Which Categories Have the Most MCP Servers?
Developer Tools leads with 54 servers (33% of the list), ahead of Other at 26. By download volume the leading category is Developer Tools, which takes 71.7% from just 54 servers.
| Category | Servers | Weekly downloads | Share | First-party | Top server |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Tools | 54 | 1,618,259 | 71.7% | 21 | Chrome DevTools MCP |
| Other | 26 | 33,934 | 1.5% | 23 | World Monitor |
| Search & Web | 24 | 12,794 | 0.6% | 10 | Agent Skills Search Server |
| AI & Memory | 13 | 4,755 | 0.2% | 6 | Codebase Memory |
| Productivity | 10 | none attributable | n/a | 8 | Repowise |
| Communication | 8 | 294 | <0.1% | 6 | Atomic Mail |
| DevOps & Monitoring | 8 | 3,604 | 0.2% | 5 | mockserver |
| Databases | 7 | 57,911 | 2.6% | 6 | ClickHouse |
| Finance | 5 | none attributable | n/a | 2 | Finance Toolkit |
| Cloud | 4 | 523,063 | 23.2% | 3 | Scrapling MCP Server |
| Design | 4 | 1,910 | 0.1% | 2 | Figma-Context-MCP |
| All 11 categories | 163 | 2,256,524 | 100% | 92 | Codebase Memory |
That developer tools lead on count is unsurprising: the first people to wire an AI into a system are the people who build systems, and coding assistants were the first clients to ship MCP support. The categories to watch are the sparse ones. A category with two or three servers and real download volume is where the protocol is being adopted faster than it is being served.
How Do You Install an MCP Server?
Every server in this list ships copy-paste configuration for four clients, which is the practical reason to use this page over a plain directory.
| AI client | Servers with a ready install snippet |
|---|---|
| Claude Desktop | 163 of 163 |
| Cursor | 163 of 163 |
| VS Code | 163 of 163 |
| Claude Code | 163 of 163 |
An MCP server runs as a small program, locally over stdio or remotely over Streamable HTTP, that an MCP client connects to. To add one, open your client config and point it at the server: in Claude Desktop edit claude_desktop_config.json, in Cursor edit ~/.cursor/mcp.json, in VS Code add a .vscode/mcp.json, or run “claude mcp add” in Claude Code. Use the MCP Inspector to test a server before wiring it into your assistant.
The transport matters for how you deploy. 116 of 163 servers run over stdio, meaning the client starts them as a local subprocess on your machine. Only 62 support Streamable HTTP, and 60 publish a hosted remote endpoint you can point at without installing anything.
That imbalance is the single biggest practical limitation of MCP today. Local stdio servers are simple and private, but they cannot be shared across a team, they do not work from a phone or a browser-only client, and every machine needs its own install and its own credentials. The servers with remote endpoints are the ones you can actually centralise:
| Server | Transports | Remote endpoint | Package | Weekly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SmartBear MCP | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | npm | 14,179 |
| mcp | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | pypi | 7,222 |
| Rootly | stdio, sse | Yes | pypi | 3,503 |
| Homespun | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | npm | 3,208 |
| Rendobar | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | npm | 1,044 |
| mcp | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | npm | 408 |
| AgentPhone | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | npm | 144 |
| mcp | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | pypi | 110 |
| BoostedTravel | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | npm, pypi | 77 |
| HeyClaude - Claude & AI workflow directory | stdio, streamable-http | Yes | npm | 54 |
| World Monitor | streamable-http | Yes | remote only | not reported |
| mcp-server | streamable-http | Yes | remote only | not reported |
Packaging follows the same practical split:
| Package registry | Servers |
|---|---|
| npm | 78 |
| pypi | 34 |
| mcpb | 10 |
| oci | 9 |
| nuget | 6 |
Are MCP Servers Secure?
On the evidence here, there is no advisory problem yet: 6 security advisories across all 163 servers, with 108 (66%) showing no known advisory and 50 not checkable because they ship no queryable package.
That is worth stating carefully rather than celebrating. A clean advisory record on a young ecosystem mostly means nobody has looked yet. Compare it with our AI WordPress plugins report, where two in three plugins have a disclosed CVE, not because WordPress plugins are worse but because WordPress has a mature vulnerability-reporting culture and a funded advisory feed. MCP has neither yet.
So the real security question for MCP is not “does this server have a CVE”. It is what the server can do once you give it credentials:
- Scope the credentials, not the server. Give a database server a read-only role. Give a cloud server a role with the two permissions it needs.
- Prefer first-party for anything holding production keys. 56% of this list qualifies.
- Read the tool list before you enable it. A server advertises the actions it can take; that list is the actual permission surface.
- Test with the MCP Inspector first, before wiring a server into an assistant that will call it autonomously.
- Treat write access as a deliberate choice. Most useful MCP work is read-only.
Are MCP Servers Actively Maintained?
Yes, more so than any other ecosystem we track. The median server was updated 3 days ago, 142 of 163 (87%) within the last 30 days, 153 within 90, and none have gone more than a year. The oldest is 290 days.
That is what a young ecosystem looks like, and it is a genuine advantage of picking an MCP server today: almost nothing here is abandoned. It also means the picture changes fast, which is why this report carries a pull date rather than pretending to be evergreen.
no servers carry a deprecated flag from the registry. They are still listed, with the flag visible, because a deprecated server does not vanish from the rest of the internet just because a directory hides it.
Best MCP Servers by Category
Nobody needs “the best MCP server”. They need one for Postgres, or Slack, or a browser. Each group below is the top servers in that category by quality score, with weekly downloads, first-party status and update recency alongside so you can overrule the ordering on whichever signal you trust most.
Best Developer Tools MCP servers
Developer-tool MCP servers are the largest and most active category, wiring AI into code, repos, and issue trackers.
These servers connect assistants like Claude and Cursor to GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Linear, and your local toolchain so an AI can read code, open pull requests, and triage issues. It is the most mature MCP category and the one most clients ship support for first.
54 servers in this category, 1,618,259 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chrome DevTools MCP | 1,563,379 | First-party | 0d ago | 93/100 |
| Windows-MCP | 18,688 | First-party | 0d ago | 89/100 |
| macOS-MCP | 2,975 | First-party | 1d ago | 86/100 |
| CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server | 8,764 | First-party | 1d ago | 85/100 |
| Funplay Unity MCP | not reported | First-party | 10d ago | 83/100 |
| FunseaAI Unity MCP | not reported | First-party | 10d ago | 83/100 |
Best Other MCP servers
Servers across every other niche are joining the MCP ecosystem.
From media and IoT to specialized internal tools, servers of every kind are adopting MCP. This catch-all category captures the breadth of the protocol beyond the obvious developer and data tools.
26 servers in this category, 33,934 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| World Monitor | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 94/100 |
| Oh My Posh Validator | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 91/100 |
| apify-mcp-server | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 90/100 |
| Microsoft Fabric MCP Server | 882 | First-party | 0d ago | 89/100 |
| Power BI Modeling MCP Server | 14,080 | First-party | 7d ago | 88/100 |
| Jitsu | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 85/100 |
Best Search & Web MCP servers
Search and web MCP servers give an AI fresh, real-world context beyond its training cutoff.
Web search, fetch, and browser-automation servers let assistants look things up, read pages, and drive a browser. They are the backbone of grounded, up-to-date AI answers.
24 servers in this category, 12,794 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent Skills Search Server | not reported | First-party | 3d ago | 93/100 |
| browser-use | library-wide | First-party | 1d ago | 91/100 |
| exa | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 87/100 |
| BoostedTravel | 77 | First-party | 2d ago | 86/100 |
| Zotero MCP | 7,638 | Community | 2d ago | 84/100 |
| Atlassian Rovo MCP Server | not reported | First-party | 11d ago | 83/100 |
Best AI & Memory MCP servers
AI and memory MCP servers give assistants persistent memory and a knowledge base.
Vector stores, knowledge graphs, and note systems let an AI remember context across sessions and ground answers in your own documents. The foundation of RAG-style workflows over MCP.
13 servers in this category, 4,755 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Codebase Memory | 4,175 | Community | 0d ago | 96/100 |
| sem | not reported | First-party | 20d ago | 89/100 |
| Persome | library-wide | First-party | 1d ago | 83/100 |
| Microsoft NuGet | not reported | First-party | 2d ago | 82/100 |
| agent-recall | 580 | Community | 3d ago | 80/100 |
| ai-context | library-wide | First-party | 0d ago | 79/100 |
Best Productivity MCP servers
Productivity MCP servers connect AI to notes, docs, files, and project tools.
Notion, Google Drive, filesystem, calendar, and task-manager servers let an AI read and update your working documents and to-dos. Among the most-installed servers because they touch everyday workflows.
10 servers in this category, 0 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repowise | library-wide | First-party | 0d ago | 95/100 |
| mcp-server | not reported | First-party | 1d ago | 91/100 |
| XcodeBuildMCP | not reported | First-party | 2d ago | 90/100 |
| Microsoft Learn MCP | not reported | First-party | 2d ago | 84/100 |
| Svelte MCP | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 81/100 |
| docfork-mcp | not reported | First-party | 55d ago | 79/100 |
Best Communication MCP servers
Communication MCP servers let AI read and send across chat and email.
Slack, Discord, email, and messaging servers let an assistant summarize threads, draft replies, and post updates. Convenient, but write access to your inbox or channels deserves scrutiny.
8 servers in this category, 294 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atomic Mail | 294 | First-party | 9d ago | 85/100 |
| draw.io | not reported | First-party | 4d ago | 85/100 |
| emailmd | not reported | First-party | 12d ago | 83/100 |
| beever-atlas | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 80/100 |
| Gmail-MCP-Server | not reported | Community | 20d ago | 73/100 |
| e2a - email for AI agents | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 73/100 |
Best DevOps & Monitoring MCP servers
DevOps and monitoring MCP servers expose infrastructure and observability data to AI.
Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform, Sentry, Grafana, and incident tools let an assistant inspect deployments, read logs, and surface errors. Powerful for on-call work, where read-only scopes are the safe default.
8 servers in this category, 3,604 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mockserver | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 86/100 |
| Unity-MCP | not reported | Community | 4d ago | 84/100 |
| Rootly | 3,503 | First-party | 1d ago | 82/100 |
| monitor | 101 | First-party | 0d ago | 81/100 |
| GoModel | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 79/100 |
| Unraid RMCP | library-wide | First-party | 2d ago | 75/100 |
Best Databases MCP servers
Database MCP servers let an AI query and inspect your data through a controlled interface.
Postgres, MySQL, SQLite, MongoDB, Redis, and managed platforms like Supabase expose schema and read (sometimes write) access over MCP. Useful for natural-language analytics, but scope the credentials carefully, since you are handing an AI a database connection.
7 servers in this category, 57,911 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClickHouse | 47,481 | First-party | 2d ago | 88/100 |
| Supabase | not reported | First-party | 1d ago | 88/100 |
| ArcadeDB MCP Server | not reported | First-party | 0d ago | 82/100 |
| mcp | 7,222 | First-party | 0d ago | 81/100 |
| QueryWeaver | not reported | First-party | 1d ago | 81/100 |
| Homespun | 3,208 | First-party | 1d ago | 79/100 |
Best Finance MCP servers
Finance MCP servers connect AI to payments, accounting, and market data.
Stripe, accounting, and banking servers let an assistant read transactions, draft invoices, and pull financial data. High-stakes by nature, so keep write access tightly scoped.
5 servers in this category, 0 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance Toolkit | library-wide | Community | 0d ago | 86/100 |
| mcp | not reported | First-party | 1d ago | 83/100 |
| blockrun-mcp | not reported | First-party | 2d ago | 81/100 |
| jjlabsio-korea-stock-mcp | not reported | Community | 1d ago | 73/100 |
| zwldarren-akshare-one-mcp | not reported | Community | 146d ago | 66/100 |
Best Cloud MCP servers
Cloud MCP servers expose AWS, Azure, GCP, and edge platforms to AI.
These servers let an assistant query cloud resources, read storage, and manage services. Among the most sensitive in this list, so prefer scoped, read-only credentials and audit every write.
4 servers in this category, 523,063 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scrapling MCP Server | library-wide | Community | 1d ago | 92/100 |
| Azure MCP Server | 114,702 | First-party | 0d ago | 89/100 |
| mcp | not reported | First-party | 3d ago | 86/100 |
| Amazon ECS MCP Server | 408,361 | First-party | 179d ago | 78/100 |
Best Design MCP servers
Design MCP servers connect AI to design tools and image generation.
Figma, asset, and image-generation servers let an AI read design files, generate visuals, or produce screenshots. A smaller but fast-growing category as design tools open up MCP access.
4 servers in this category, 1,910 combined weekly downloads.
| Server | Weekly downloads | First-party | Updated | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Figma-Context-MCP | not reported | Community | 0d ago | 88/100 |
| Figma MCP Server | not reported | First-party | 1d ago | 82/100 |
| ai-test-process-mcp | 1,910 | Community | 0d ago | 74/100 |
| mcp | not reported | First-party | 59d ago | 71/100 |
The Full List: All 163 MCP Servers Ranked
Every ranked server, ordered by quality score, with the inputs shown so you can check the arithmetic. Click any server to open its repository. Where a value reads “not reported”, the upstream source did not return it and we would rather say so than print a zero.
| # | MCP server | Category | Weekly downloads | GitHub stars | First-party | Licence | Updated | Security | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Codebase Memory | AI & Memory | 4,175 | 37,981 | Community | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 96 |
| 2 | Repowise | Productivity | library-wide | 4,833 | First-party | AGPL-3.0 | 0d ago | No known advisory | 95 |
| 3 | World Monitor | Other | not reported | 79,567 | First-party | not reported | 0d ago | Not checked | 94 |
| 4 | Chrome DevTools MCP | Developer Tools | 1,563,379 | 48,690 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | Advisory, patched | 93 |
| 5 | Agent Skills Search Server | Search & Web | not reported | 23,976 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 3d ago | Not checked | 93 |
| 6 | Scrapling MCP Server | Cloud | library-wide | 72,958 | Community | BSD-3-Clause | 1d ago | No known advisory | 92 |
| 7 | browser-use | Search & Web | library-wide | 108,166 | First-party | MIT | 1d ago | Advisory, patched | 91 |
| 8 | mcp-server | Productivity | not reported | 42,995 | First-party | AGPL-3.0 | 1d ago | Not checked | 91 |
| 9 | Oh My Posh Validator | Other | not reported | 23,230 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 91 |
| 10 | XcodeBuildMCP | Productivity | not reported | 6,202 | First-party | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 90 |
| 11 | apify-mcp-server | Other | not reported | 2,834 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 90 |
| 12 | Azure MCP Server | Cloud | 114,702 | 3,546 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Advisory, patched | 89 |
| 13 | Windows-MCP | Developer Tools | 18,688 | 6,664 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Advisory, patched | 89 |
| 14 | Microsoft Fabric MCP Server | Other | 882 | 3,546 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 89 |
| 15 | sem | AI & Memory | not reported | 3,279 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 20d ago | No known advisory | 89 |
| 16 | ClickHouse | Databases | 47,481 | 844 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 2d ago | No known advisory | 88 |
| 17 | Power BI Modeling MCP Server | Other | 14,080 | 1,050 | First-party | MIT | 7d ago | No known advisory | 88 |
| 18 | Figma-Context-MCP | Design | not reported | 15,604 | Community | MIT | 0d ago | Advisory, patched | 88 |
| 19 | Supabase | Databases | not reported | 2,855 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 1d ago | No known advisory | 88 |
| 20 | exa | Search & Web | not reported | 4,828 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 87 |
| 21 | macOS-MCP | Developer Tools | 2,975 | 145 | First-party | MIT | 1d ago | No known advisory | 86 |
| 22 | BoostedTravel | Search & Web | 77 | 1,643 | First-party | not reported | 2d ago | No known advisory | 86 |
| 23 | Finance Toolkit | Finance | library-wide | 5,199 | Community | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 86 |
| 24 | mockserver | DevOps & Monitoring | not reported | 4,933 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | Not checked | 86 |
| 25 | mcp | Cloud | not reported | 4,036 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 3d ago | Not checked | 86 |
| 26 | CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server | Developer Tools | 8,764 | 230 | First-party | MIT | 1d ago | No known advisory | 85 |
| 27 | Atomic Mail | Communication | 294 | 270 | First-party | MIT | 9d ago | No known advisory | 85 |
| 28 | draw.io | Communication | not reported | 5,133 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 4d ago | Not checked | 85 |
| 29 | Jitsu | Other | not reported | 5,010 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 85 |
| 30 | voicemode | Other | library-wide | 1,312 | First-party | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 85 |
| 31 | Zotero MCP | Search & Web | 7,638 | 4,565 | Community | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 84 |
| 32 | strata | Other | not reported | 5,786 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 67d ago | Not checked | 84 |
| 33 | Unity-MCP | DevOps & Monitoring | not reported | 3,838 | Community | Apache-2.0 | 4d ago | Not checked | 84 |
| 34 | Microsoft Learn MCP | Productivity | not reported | 1,819 | First-party | CC-BY-4.0 | 2d ago | Not checked | 84 |
| 35 | SmartBear MCP | Other | 14,179 | 42 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 83 |
| 36 | Anki MCP Server | Other | 606 | 419 | First-party | MIT | 16d ago | No known advisory | 83 |
| 37 | mcp | Finance | not reported | 1,726 | First-party | MIT | 1d ago | Not checked | 83 |
| 38 | Persome | AI & Memory | library-wide | 1,347 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 1d ago | No known advisory | 83 |
| 39 | emailmd | Communication | not reported | 1,292 | First-party | MIT | 12d ago | No known advisory | 83 |
| 40 | Atlassian Rovo MCP Server | Search & Web | not reported | 945 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 11d ago | Not checked | 83 |
| 41 | Funplay Unity MCP | Developer Tools | not reported | 211 | First-party | MIT | 10d ago | No known advisory | 83 |
| 42 | FunseaAI Unity MCP | Developer Tools | not reported | 211 | First-party | MIT | 10d ago | No known advisory | 83 |
| 43 | Rootly | DevOps & Monitoring | 3,503 | 45 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 1d ago | No known advisory | 82 |
| 44 | mcp | Other | not reported | 2,597 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | Not checked | 82 |
| 45 | Figma MCP Server | Design | not reported | 1,863 | First-party | not reported | 1d ago | Not checked | 82 |
| 46 | Microsoft NuGet | AI & Memory | not reported | 1,553 | First-party | not reported | 2d ago | No known advisory | 82 |
| 47 | ArcadeDB MCP Server | Databases | not reported | 1,065 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | Not checked | 82 |
| 48 | mcp | Databases | 7,222 | 84 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 81 |
| 49 | Auth0 MCP Server | Other | 3,143 | 112 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 81 |
| 50 | monitor | DevOps & Monitoring | 101 | 1,232 | First-party | not reported | 0d ago | No known advisory | 81 |
| 51 | browserbasehq-mcp-browserbase | Search & Web | not reported | 3,416 | Community | Apache-2.0 | 18d ago | Not checked | 81 |
| 52 | claude-real-video | Developer Tools | library-wide | 1,973 | Community | MIT | 4d ago | No known advisory | 81 |
| 53 | QueryWeaver | Databases | not reported | 1,060 | First-party | AGPL-3.0 | 1d ago | Not checked | 81 |
| 54 | blockrun-mcp | Finance | not reported | 479 | First-party | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 81 |
| 55 | Svelte MCP | Productivity | not reported | 304 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 81 |
| 56 | agent-recall | AI & Memory | 580 | 364 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 80 |
| 57 | MCP Fiscal Brasil | Developer Tools | 162 | 137 | First-party | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 80 |
| 58 | unreal-engine-mcp | Developer Tools | not reported | 822 | Community | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 80 |
| 59 | touchdesigner-mcp-server | Developer Tools | not reported | 466 | Community | MIT | 1d ago | No known advisory | 80 |
| 60 | beever-atlas | Communication | not reported | 437 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | Not checked | 80 |
| 61 | postman-mcp-server | Developer Tools | not reported | 293 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 2d ago | No known advisory | 80 |
| 62 | Xquik MCP Server | Other | not reported | 176 | First-party | MIT | 4d ago | Not checked | 80 |
| 63 | adeu | Other | not reported | 135 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 80 |
| 64 | Deep Agentic Core MCP | Developer Tools | 9,076 | not reported | First-party | not reported | 2d ago | No known advisory | 79 |
| 65 | OpenTakeoff | Developer Tools | 3,260 | 65 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | No known advisory | 79 |
| 66 | Homespun | Databases | 3,208 | 1 | First-party | MIT | 1d ago | No known advisory | 79 |
| 67 | brave | Search & Web | not reported | 1,358 | Community | MIT | 2d ago | Not checked | 79 |
| 68 | GoModel | DevOps & Monitoring | not reported | 1,043 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 79 |
| 69 | docfork-mcp | Productivity | not reported | 489 | First-party | MIT | 55d ago | No known advisory | 79 |
| 70 | gk-cli | Developer Tools | not reported | 442 | First-party | not reported | 3d ago | No known advisory | 79 |
| 71 | ai-context | AI & Memory | library-wide | 3 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | No known advisory | 79 |
| 72 | Amazon ECS MCP Server | Cloud | 408,361 | not reported | First-party | not reported | 179d ago | No known advisory | 78 |
| 73 | Unraid MCP | Developer Tools | 2,204 | 121 | First-party | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 78 |
| 74 | monday.com | Productivity | not reported | 417 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 78 |
| 75 | spotifyscraper | Developer Tools | library-wide | 288 | Community | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 78 |
| 76 | zoo-mcp | Developer Tools | 1,340 | 8 | First-party | MIT | 1d ago | No known advisory | 77 |
| 77 | mcp | Developer Tools | 408 | 179 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 1d ago | No known advisory | 77 |
| 78 | google-surf-mcp | Search & Web | 364 | 276 | Community | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 77 |
| 79 | Ignite UI MCP Server | Developer Tools | 348 | 136 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 77 |
| 80 | ChiR24-unreal_mcp | Other | not reported | 822 | Community | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 77 |
| 81 | ChiR24-unreal_mcp_server | AI & Memory | not reported | 822 | Community | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 77 |
| 82 | Memorix | AI & Memory | not reported | 613 | Community | Apache-2.0 | 1d ago | No known advisory | 77 |
| 83 | mcp-server | Other | not reported | 305 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | Not checked | 77 |
| 84 | Code Pathfinder | Search & Web | library-wide | 140 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 28d ago | No known advisory | 77 |
| 85 | Docmancer | AI & Memory | library-wide | 119 | First-party | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 77 |
| 86 | ClaudeR - RStudio MCP Server | Developer Tools | 3,275 | 314 | Community | not reported | 4d ago | No known advisory | 76 |
| 87 | Rendobar | Other | 1,044 | 1 | First-party | MIT | 1d ago | No known advisory | 76 |
| 88 | glade-mcp | Developer Tools | 786 | 187 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 76 |
| 89 | Alfanous - Quranic Search Engine | Search & Web | 106 | 286 | First-party | LGPL-3.0 | 55d ago | No known advisory | 76 |
| 90 | HeyClaude - Claude & AI workflow directory | Search & Web | 54 | 286 | Community | MIT | 7d ago | No known advisory | 76 |
| 91 | Zapier | Other | not reported | 372 | First-party | MIT | 9d ago | Not checked | 76 |
| 92 | gopeak | Developer Tools | library-wide | 239 | Community | MIT | 25d ago | No known advisory | 76 |
| 93 | mcp-accessibility-scanner | Search & Web | 1,726 | 56 | Community | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 75 |
| 94 | dash-mcp-server | Search & Web | 45 | 175 | Community | MIT | 7d ago | No known advisory | 75 |
| 95 | ref-tools-ref-tools-mcp | Other | not reported | 1,149 | Community | MIT | 42d ago | Not checked | 75 |
| 96 | misakanet | Search & Web | library-wide | 420 | Community | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | No known advisory | 75 |
| 97 | office-oxide-mcp | Developer Tools | not reported | 155 | First-party | GPL-3.0 | 52d ago | No known advisory | 75 |
| 98 | Funplay Cocos MCP | Developer Tools | not reported | 152 | First-party | MIT | 7d ago | No known advisory | 75 |
| 99 | Unraid RMCP | DevOps & Monitoring | library-wide | 121 | First-party | MIT | 2d ago | No known advisory | 75 |
| 100 | ai-test-process-mcp | Design | 1,910 | not reported | Community | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 101 | Kiwoom Securities MCP Server | Developer Tools | 1,663 | 1 | Community | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 102 | dex-data | Search & Web | 1,581 | not reported | First-party | not reported | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 103 | AgentPhone | Developer Tools | 144 | 112 | First-party | MIT | 9d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 104 | squirrelscan | Other | not reported | 252 | First-party | MIT | 0d ago | Not checked | 74 |
| 105 | build | Developer Tools | library-wide | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 106 | cargo | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 107 | docker | DevOps & Monitoring | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 108 | git | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 109 | github | Developer Tools | library-wide | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 110 | go | Developer Tools | library-wide | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 111 | http | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 112 | lint | Developer Tools | library-wide | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 113 | make | Productivity | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 114 | npm | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 115 | pare-build | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 116 | pare-cargo | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 117 | pare-docker | DevOps & Monitoring | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 118 | pare-git | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 119 | pare-github | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 120 | pare-go | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 121 | pare-http | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 122 | pare-lint | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 123 | pare-make | Productivity | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 124 | pare-npm | Developer Tools | library-wide | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 125 | pare-python | Developer Tools | library-wide | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 126 | pare-search | Search & Web | library-wide | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 127 | pare-test | Developer Tools | library-wide | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 128 | python | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 129 | search | Search & Web | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 130 | test | Developer Tools | not reported | 136 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 131 | inspeximus | AI & Memory | library-wide | 5 | Community | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 132 | Amicus | Developer Tools | library-wide | not reported | Community | MIT | 0d ago | No known advisory | 74 |
| 133 | playwright-stealth | Search & Web | 1,203 | 75 | Community | MIT | 12d ago | No known advisory | 73 |
| 134 | hustcc-mcp-mermaid | Other | not reported | 621 | Community | MIT | 84d ago | Not checked | 73 |
| 135 | emisar | Other | not reported | 420 | First-party | not reported | 0d ago | Not checked | 73 |
| 136 | SqlServer.Rules | Databases | not reported | 237 | Community | MIT | 3d ago | No known advisory | 73 |
| 137 | Gmail-MCP-Server | Communication | not reported | 223 | Community | MIT | 20d ago | No known advisory | 73 |
| 138 | Glif | Other | not reported | 199 | First-party | MIT | 8d ago | Not checked | 73 |
| 139 | e2a - email for AI agents | Communication | not reported | 181 | First-party | Apache-2.0 | 0d ago | Not checked | 73 |
| 140 | Betterlytics | Search & Web | not reported | 172 | First-party | AGPL-3.0 | 1d ago | Not checked | 73 |
| 141 | jjlabsio-korea-stock-mcp | Finance | not reported | 170 | Community | ISC | 1d ago | Not checked | 73 |
| 142 | mcp-server | Search & Web | not reported | 115 | First-party | MIT | 8d ago | Not checked | 73 |
| 143 | bettermemory | AI & Memory | library-wide | not reported | Community | MIT | 1d ago | No known advisory | 73 |
| 144 | Excalidraw Architect | Developer Tools | 555 | 139 | Community | MIT | 60d ago | No known advisory | 72 |
| 145 | docfork-mcp | Developer Tools | not reported | 489 | Community | MIT | 55d ago | Not checked | 72 |
| 146 | virustotal | Developer Tools | not reported | 142 | Community | MIT | 75d ago | No known advisory | 71 |
| 147 | mcp | Design | not reported | 135 | First-party | MIT | 59d ago | Not checked | 71 |
| 148 | docs-mcp | Productivity | not reported | 114 | First-party | not reported | 2d ago | Not checked | 71 |
| 149 | fondue-city-mcp | Developer Tools | 1,122 | not reported | Community | not reported | 3d ago | No known advisory | 70 |
| 150 | pinkpixel-dev-web-scout-mcp | Search & Web | not reported | 132 | Community | Apache-2.0 | 17d ago | Not checked | 70 |
| 151 | mcp | Developer Tools | 110 | 125 | First-party | MIT | 148d ago | No known advisory | 69 |
| 152 | DeepSeek MCP Server | Communication | not reported | 351 | Community | MIT | 105d ago | No known advisory | 69 |
| 153 | DottedSign | Developer Tools | not reported | 143 | First-party | not reported | 23d ago | Not checked | 69 |
| 154 | ClawLink | Communication | not reported | 117 | First-party | AGPL-3.0 | 0d ago | Not checked | 69 |
| 155 | context-sync | AI & Memory | library-wide | 183 | Community | MIT | 118d ago | No known advisory | 67 |
| 156 | Glean Remote MCP Server | AI & Memory | not reported | 164 | First-party | MIT | 112d ago | Not checked | 67 |
| 157 | Analook - Competitor Intelligence | Developer Tools | not reported | 105 | Community | not reported | 1d ago | Not checked | 67 |
| 158 | oxylabs-oxylabs-mcp | Search & Web | not reported | 101 | Community | MIT | 60d ago | Not checked | 67 |
| 159 | zwldarren-akshare-one-mcp | Finance | not reported | 219 | Community | MIT | 146d ago | Not checked | 66 |
| 160 | svelte-llm-mcp | Other | not reported | 160 | First-party | MIT | 175d ago | Not checked | 66 |
| 161 | shodan | Search & Web | not reported | 148 | Community | MIT | 129d ago | No known advisory | 66 |
| 162 | mcp | Other | not reported | 178 | First-party | not reported | 98d ago | Not checked | 64 |
| 163 | hypertool-mcp | Other | not reported | 155 | First-party | not reported | 290d ago | No known advisory | 61 |
What This Data Says About MCP Right Now
Five conclusions, all checkable against the tables above:
- MCP is still mostly a local-process protocol. 116 of 163 servers run over stdio, and while 60 now publish a hosted endpoint, that leaves the majority installable only on the machine that runs the AI client. It is shifting, but MCP is still a developer-machine technology more than a team one.
- First-party is the signal to buy on. 56% of servers are vendor-built and they take 98.9% of all download volume, so the ecosystem is consolidating around official bridges.
- Adoption is concentrated, but less than published figures suggest. Once library-wide packages are set aside, the most-downloaded MCP server takes 69.3% of attributable volume against a median of 1,663 a week. That is still a steep curve, and it is the honest version of it.
- The clean security record is a maturity artefact, not a guarantee. 6 advisories across 163 servers, all patched, is not evidence that MCP servers are safe: 50 of them publish nothing an advisory database can be queried against, so their record is unknown rather than clean. Scope every credential you hand a server as if a disclosure were coming.
- Nothing here is abandoned yet. Median 3 days since update, which is the healthiest maintenance profile of any ecosystem in this series.
“The star counts and the awesome-lists tell you what developers find interesting. What actually decides whether you should install an MCP server is narrower: did the vendor build it, what credentials does it want, and can you run it anywhere other than your own laptop. On that last one the answer is still mostly no, and that is the real state of MCP in 2026, whatever the server count suggests.”
Alston Antony, founder of zplatform.ai and Senior Digital Marketing Manager at Brainstorm Force
Connecting AI to other places instead? The best AI WordPress plugins report carries a full CVE audit, the best Hugging Face models report ranks open-weight models on download data, and the AI Chrome extensions and AI Firefox add-ons reports cover the browser. More sit in best AI tools.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an MCP server?
An MCP server is a program that exposes tools, data and prompts to AI applications through the Model Context Protocol. It acts as a standardised bridge so an assistant like Claude, Cursor or ChatGPT can read from and act on an external system, a database, a GitHub repo, a Slack workspace, without custom integration code.
What does MCP stand for?
MCP stands for Model Context Protocol, an open standard introduced by Anthropic in November 2024 for connecting AI applications to external tools and data sources.
How does an MCP server work?
An MCP host (the AI app) runs a client that connects to one or more servers over JSON-RPC. Servers expose three primitives: tools the AI can call, resources it can read, and prompts it can reuse. The two transports are stdio for local servers and Streamable HTTP for remote ones. In this list 116 of 163 servers use stdio.
What are the best MCP servers?
By weekly package downloads the leader is Chrome DevTools MCP at 1,563,379. By our composite quality score, which weighs maintenance, trust and security alongside adoption, the leader is Codebase Memory at 96/100. Both full rankings are above, and the category sections narrow it to the job you actually have.
Where can I find a list of MCP servers?
This page is one, built from the official MCP Registry and enriched with adoption, maintenance and security data. The canonical source is the registry itself at registry.modelcontextprotocol.io; this report adds the comparison layer on top so you can rank and filter rather than only browse.
Are MCP servers free?
Most are free and open-source, and you install them at no cost. Some connect to paid third-party services (a database host, a SaaS API) that need your own account and API key, but the server software itself is typically free. Every row shows the install method and package registry.
What are the most popular MCP servers?
By weekly downloads: Chrome DevTools MCP (1,563,379), Amazon ECS MCP Server (408,361) and Azure MCP Server (114,702). Popularity clusters around Developer Tools, which takes 71.7% of all download volume from 54 servers.
What is the difference between an MCP server and an API?
An API is a service-specific interface, so every integration is bespoke. An MCP server wraps a system, which may itself sit on an API, in the standard Model Context Protocol, so any MCP-capable client can use it the same way. MCP is the universal adapter; an API is the underlying outlet.
MCP versus RAG: what is the difference?
RAG retrieves relevant text and injects it into a prompt. MCP is a connection protocol that lets an AI call live tools and read data sources directly, including taking actions. They are complementary: an MCP server can power retrieval for RAG, but MCP also covers actions RAG alone does not.
What are the best MCP servers for Claude Code?
Every server in this list works with Claude Code and ships a copy-paste “claude mcp add” command. For coding specifically the useful groups are developer tools, filesystem, databases, and browser or search servers. Use the Developer Tools section above, which is the largest category at 54 servers.
Which AI tools support MCP servers?
Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code all support MCP, and every server in this build ships install snippets for those four. ChatGPT, Gemini and Windsurf have also added MCP support. The client table above shows snippet coverage across all 163 servers.
What is the official MCP Registry?
The official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io) is the canonical index of MCP servers, where publishers register under an ownership-verified reverse-DNS namespace. That verification is what makes the first-party badge in this report meaningful, and this list is built from it.
How do I install an MCP server in Claude Desktop?
Open Claude Desktop settings, edit claude_desktop_config.json, add the server under “mcpServers” with its command, args and any required environment variables, then restart Claude Desktop. Every row in the full list above provides the exact JSON, along with the equivalent for Cursor, VS Code and Claude Code.
How many MCP servers are there?
The official registry lists thousands and grows daily. This report ranks the 163 that clear the quality gate and adoption floor: a description, a working install method, and real adoption, as of 7 August 2026.
Who created MCP?
Anthropic created the Model Context Protocol and released it as an open standard in November 2024. It has since been adopted by many AI vendors, with an open-source community maintaining the specification and the official registry.
Methodology and How to Cite This Data
Sources: server identity, install methods and status from the official MCP Registry; stars, licence and last-commit recency from the GitHub REST and GraphQL APIs; weekly downloads from npm and PyPI; security advisories from the GitHub Advisory Database. 6 snapshots retained for trend history.
Sample: 163 servers, 2,256,524 combined weekly downloads, 11 categories, 92 first-party, 163 with install snippets across 4 AI clients.
Ranking formula: Quality Score = 35% adoption (GitHub stars and weekly package downloads, log-scaled) + 25% maintenance (update recency and release cadence) + 15% growth (30-day trend from our own snapshots) + 15% trust (first-party namespace, open-source licence, public repository) + 10% security (known unpatched advisories).
Inclusion: automatic. Every registry server with a description, a working install method and real adoption. Deleted servers excluded, deprecated servers kept and badged. No hand-picking, no paid placement.
Download attribution rule: a server’s download count is only counted when the npm or PyPI package it points at is the MCP server itself, which we test by requiring the package name to reference MCP. Registry entries pointing at a wider general-purpose library are excluded from every download total and marked library-wide in the full list, because that count measures the library rather than the server. In this build that excluded 26 servers and 13,655,940 weekly downloads, 86% of the raw sum. The rule is deliberately mechanical, so it is reproducible and it errs toward excluding a genuine MCP package rather than inflating a total. It cannot split a single shared package across a family of servers.
Stated limitations: adoption is a proxy. MCP has no universal usage metric, so package downloads and stars stand in for it and are never presented as install counts. Where the upstream GitHub fetch does not return data for a server, its stars, licence and release history read “not reported” rather than zero, and any trend figure that would imply a total collapse as a result is suppressed rather than published. Coverage in this build: 156 of 163 servers with a star count, 146 with a licence, 44 with attributable download data, 120 with a usable trend (0 suppressed as artefacts). Security is “not checked” for servers with no queryable package rather than reported as clean.
Cite as: zplatform.ai, “Best MCP Servers: The Complete Ranked List,” data pulled 7 August 2026.
Every number here traces to a row in the tables above, and where a number is missing this page says so instead of guessing. That is the whole point of publishing the method next to the ranking: the best MCP server for you depends on what you are connecting and what credentials you are willing to hand over, and you should be able to check the working rather than take my word for it.